https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43450 Show cause notices issued under excise directives were treated as covered by an earlier Supreme Court decision on levy of duty on sized yarn and by the retrospective amendment to the excise rules. The Court noted that the controversy was already substantially settled, that the notices had been issued after a long lapse of time, and that insisting on separate challenges to each notice would multiply proceedings and cause unnecessary delay and expense. On that basis, the writ petitions were allowed and the impugned notices were quashed. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43450 Show cause notices issued under excise directives were treated as covered by an earlier Supreme Court decision on levy of duty on sized yarn and by the retrospective amendment to the excise rules. The Court noted that the controversy was already substantially settled, that the notices had been issued after a long lapse of time, and that insisting on separate challenges to each notice would multiply proceedings and cause unnecessary delay and expense. On that basis, the writ petitions were allowed and the impugned notices were quashed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43450