<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 318 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770046</link>
    <description>Claims for employee dues linked to an approved resolution and takeover were held to be outside the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s first-instance jurisdiction under the IBC context discussed here. The Tribunal accepted that any grievance arising from the order approving the resolution arrangement should be pursued before the National Company Law Tribunal in the connected company application, rather than before the Appellate Tribunal. It also stated that it was not examining the merits of the competing claims. The applicants were left at liberty to raise their grievances before the proper forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 318 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770046</link>
      <description>Claims for employee dues linked to an approved resolution and takeover were held to be outside the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s first-instance jurisdiction under the IBC context discussed here. The Tribunal accepted that any grievance arising from the order approving the resolution arrangement should be pursued before the National Company Law Tribunal in the connected company application, rather than before the Appellate Tribunal. It also stated that it was not examining the merits of the competing claims. The applicants were left at liberty to raise their grievances before the proper forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>