<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 325 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that rejection of registration and cancellation of provisional registration had been made on an incomplete factual record, with the Commissioner focusing on unexplained advances and a reclassified loan without adequate verification of the supporting material. It noted the assessee&#039;s case that the amounts were reflected in the books, routed through banking channels, and connected to a pending application before the Charity Commissioner. As the relevant facts and documentary evidence had not been fully examined, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with one final opportunity to furnish the requisite details. The impugned rejection was therefore not sustained on the existing record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 325 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that rejection of registration and cancellation of provisional registration had been made on an incomplete factual record, with the Commissioner focusing on unexplained advances and a reclassified loan without adequate verification of the supporting material. It noted the assessee&#039;s case that the amounts were reflected in the books, routed through banking channels, and connected to a pending application before the Charity Commissioner. As the relevant facts and documentary evidence had not been fully examined, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with one final opportunity to furnish the requisite details. The impugned rejection was therefore not sustained on the existing record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>