<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 333 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770061</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal challenging a tax reassessment notice under Section 148. The tribunal found the notice invalid as it was unsigned by the Assessing Officer. Without proper signature, the reopening of assessment proceedings was deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the impugned order, ruling in favor of the assessee and rendering subsequent proceedings non-maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 333 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770061</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal challenging a tax reassessment notice under Section 148. The tribunal found the notice invalid as it was unsigned by the Assessing Officer. Without proper signature, the reopening of assessment proceedings was deemed legally unsustainable. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the impugned order, ruling in favor of the assessee and rendering subsequent proceedings non-maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>