<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770073</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against additions made under sections 68 and 69C for treating sales receipts as bogus. The AO had initially accepted the books of accounts and stock records in assessment under section 143(3) after examining purchase and sales details. However, in reassessment proceedings, the AO treated the same sales as bogus solely based on statements from parties claiming they provided accommodation entries, without granting cross-examination opportunity to the assessee. The assessee demonstrated actual delivery of goods from regular stock with proper records. The tribunal held that additions cannot be made merely because the other party denied transactions without providing cross-examination opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:58:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770073</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against additions made under sections 68 and 69C for treating sales receipts as bogus. The AO had initially accepted the books of accounts and stock records in assessment under section 143(3) after examining purchase and sales details. However, in reassessment proceedings, the AO treated the same sales as bogus solely based on statements from parties claiming they provided accommodation entries, without granting cross-examination opportunity to the assessee. The assessee demonstrated actual delivery of goods from regular stock with proper records. The tribunal held that additions cannot be made merely because the other party denied transactions without providing cross-examination opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>