<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 350 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770078</link>
    <description>Income Tax Tribunal analyzed penalty provisions under section 271(1)(c) regarding income declaration discrepancies. The SC held that penalty is not automatic and requires proof of deliberate concealment. When a search-related return under section 153A is accepted without additions, penalty cannot be imposed based on differences from the original return. The Tribunal deleted the Rs. 6,200 penalty, finding no intentional misrepresentation by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:58:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 350 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770078</link>
      <description>Income Tax Tribunal analyzed penalty provisions under section 271(1)(c) regarding income declaration discrepancies. The SC held that penalty is not automatic and requires proof of deliberate concealment. When a search-related return under section 153A is accepted without additions, penalty cannot be imposed based on differences from the original return. The Tribunal deleted the Rs. 6,200 penalty, finding no intentional misrepresentation by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>