<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43443</link>
    <description>After the Appellate Authority set aside both original customs orders and remanded the matter for fresh composite consideration, the petitioners could not insist that the earlier order survived while the later order was a nullity. The Court held that, in that procedural setting, all contentions had to be pursued before the Tribunal in the pending appeals, and the Tribunal alone would decide them in accordance with law. The request for mandamus based on the alleged survival of the earlier order was rejected, and the writ petitions were dismissed, leaving the parties to proceed with the appeals expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43443</link>
      <description>After the Appellate Authority set aside both original customs orders and remanded the matter for fresh composite consideration, the petitioners could not insist that the earlier order survived while the later order was a nullity. The Court held that, in that procedural setting, all contentions had to be pursued before the Tribunal in the pending appeals, and the Tribunal alone would decide them in accordance with law. The request for mandamus based on the alleged survival of the earlier order was rejected, and the writ petitions were dismissed, leaving the parties to proceed with the appeals expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>