https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43442 Regulation 9 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 required at least one partner to pass the prescribed examination within the stipulated period before a regular licence could be granted, and Regulation 20(2) required prior approval for appointment of a person to assist the licensee after consideration of antecedents and character. On the facts, no partner qualified in time and the claimed manager appointment was not satisfactorily established. The refusal to approve the appointment was therefore not shown to be arbitrary or illegal, and writ interference under Article 226 was declined. en-us Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:41:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43442 Regulation 9 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 required at least one partner to pass the prescribed examination within the stipulated period before a regular licence could be granted, and Regulation 20(2) required prior approval for appointment of a person to assist the licensee after consideration of antecedents and character. On the facts, no partner qualified in time and the claimed manager appointment was not satisfactorily established. The refusal to approve the appointment was therefore not shown to be arbitrary or illegal, and writ interference under Article 226 was declined. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43442