<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 375 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770103</link>
    <description>Where an appeal was already pending with an accompanying stay petition, the Kerala HC confined the relief to time-bound consideration of the stay application. The court held that, in these circumstances, an appropriate direction could be issued to prevent delay in dealing with interim relief. The appellate authority was directed to consider and pass orders on the stay petition expeditiously, in any event within one month from receipt of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 375 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770103</link>
      <description>Where an appeal was already pending with an accompanying stay petition, the Kerala HC confined the relief to time-bound consideration of the stay application. The court held that, in these circumstances, an appropriate direction could be issued to prevent delay in dealing with interim relief. The appellate authority was directed to consider and pass orders on the stay petition expeditiously, in any event within one month from receipt of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>