<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43441</link>
    <description>Regulations 8 and 9 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 were read as a composite scheme granting a temporary licence-holder three chances only in the written-cum-oral examination within the prescribed period. The scheme did not create four separate examinations; the timing of oral appearances depended on when the written test was cleared. A circular and public notice issued in 1988 were treated as a limited, one-time relaxation for pending cases where candidates had passed the written examination but failed the oral stage. Because the regulations were never amended, the relaxation could not become a continuing right or enlarge the statutory examination scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43441</link>
      <description>Regulations 8 and 9 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 were read as a composite scheme granting a temporary licence-holder three chances only in the written-cum-oral examination within the prescribed period. The scheme did not create four separate examinations; the timing of oral appearances depended on when the written test was cleared. A circular and public notice issued in 1988 were treated as a limited, one-time relaxation for pending cases where candidates had passed the written examination but failed the oral stage. Because the regulations were never amended, the relaxation could not become a continuing right or enlarge the statutory examination scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>