<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 378 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770106</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the transferor company regarding Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims on imports. The court set aside show-cause notices issued by tax authorities, finding that ITC restrictions under Rule 36(4) do not apply to import-related invoices. The HC mandated that the proper officer must grant a personal hearing, consider prior proceedings, and allow the company to explain discrepancies in tax returns. The case was remanded for fresh consideration with procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 378 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770106</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the transferor company regarding Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims on imports. The court set aside show-cause notices issued by tax authorities, finding that ITC restrictions under Rule 36(4) do not apply to import-related invoices. The HC mandated that the proper officer must grant a personal hearing, consider prior proceedings, and allow the company to explain discrepancies in tax returns. The case was remanded for fresh consideration with procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>