<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 385 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770113</link>
    <description>Parallel proceedings initiated through notices under Section 70 of the CGST Act were later transferred by the Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, to the other respondent. As the proceedings were no longer continuing in parallel and now stood before one authority, the petition had served its purpose and was disposed of. The text reflects a procedural resolution based on transfer of proceedings rather than any substantive determination on the underlying tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 385 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770113</link>
      <description>Parallel proceedings initiated through notices under Section 70 of the CGST Act were later transferred by the Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, to the other respondent. As the proceedings were no longer continuing in parallel and now stood before one authority, the petition had served its purpose and was disposed of. The text reflects a procedural resolution based on transfer of proceedings rather than any substantive determination on the underlying tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>