<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 386 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770114</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition, quashing the ex parte cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s registration. The court held the show-cause notice defective for not identifying the officer or manner of appearance, and observed the petitioner received no proper or personal hearing; the cancellation therefore violated principles of natural justice and lacked application of mind, failing Article 14. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 386 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770114</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition, quashing the ex parte cancellation of the petitioner&#039;s registration. The court held the show-cause notice defective for not identifying the officer or manner of appearance, and observed the petitioner received no proper or personal hearing; the cancellation therefore violated principles of natural justice and lacked application of mind, failing Article 14. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>