https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770115 A writ petition challenged a show cause notice and recovery action under the CGST Act that relied on Circular No. 80/54/2018-GST, on the ground that the circular had already been set aside by another High Court and the issue was pending before the Supreme Court. The petitioner also contended that the dispute was one of goods classification and did not involve suppression on the stated facts. Pending further consideration, the court directed filing of a counter affidavit and restrained the respondents from taking coercive recovery measures under the impugned order. en-us Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 May 2025 09:58:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770115 A writ petition challenged a show cause notice and recovery action under the CGST Act that relied on Circular No. 80/54/2018-GST, on the ground that the circular had already been set aside by another High Court and the issue was pending before the Supreme Court. The petitioner also contended that the dispute was one of goods classification and did not involve suppression on the stated facts. Pending further consideration, the court directed filing of a counter affidavit and restrained the respondents from taking coercive recovery measures under the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770115