<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43439</link>
    <description>The court declined to interfere with the Assistant Collector&#039;s order refixing the value of Dathatsu Diesel engines, emphasizing the availability of the right to appeal to the Collector (Appeals). Regarding an order of confiscation under Section 128 of the Customs Act, the court highlighted the appealable nature of the order, allowing the petitioner to raise all grounds before the Appellate Authority. Emphasizing fairness and reasonableness in customs matters, the court stressed the role of the appellate authority in deciding on the redemption of goods. The court dismissed the writ petitions, directing the petitioner to pursue appeals before the appellate authority for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:31:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43439</link>
      <description>The court declined to interfere with the Assistant Collector&#039;s order refixing the value of Dathatsu Diesel engines, emphasizing the availability of the right to appeal to the Collector (Appeals). Regarding an order of confiscation under Section 128 of the Customs Act, the court highlighted the appealable nature of the order, allowing the petitioner to raise all grounds before the Appellate Authority. Emphasizing fairness and reasonableness in customs matters, the court stressed the role of the appellate authority in deciding on the redemption of goods. The court dismissed the writ petitions, directing the petitioner to pursue appeals before the appellate authority for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>