<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1654 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461875</link>
    <description>Tribunal resolved a key tax law issue regarding retrospective application of late fee under section 234E of Income Tax Act. After analyzing conflicting HC judgments, the Tribunal held that late fee can only be levied prospectively from 01.06.2015, not retrospectively. Following the principle of favoring the assessee in conflicting judicial decisions, the Tribunal ordered deletion of late fees for pre-amendment TDS statement defaults.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 09:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1654 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461875</link>
      <description>Tribunal resolved a key tax law issue regarding retrospective application of late fee under section 234E of Income Tax Act. After analyzing conflicting HC judgments, the Tribunal held that late fee can only be levied prospectively from 01.06.2015, not retrospectively. Following the principle of favoring the assessee in conflicting judicial decisions, the Tribunal ordered deletion of late fees for pre-amendment TDS statement defaults.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>