<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43422</link>
    <description>An exemption notification using the phrase &quot;duty of customs&quot; was construed in line with the earlier connected judgment, and the broader reading that it extended beyond basic customs duty was rejected. The notification was also interpreted on the description &quot;polyester fibre&quot;; on the material considered, polyester staple fibre was treated as falling within that description because staple length was understood as a normal commercial attribute of polyester fibre, while polyester fibre waste was said to fall under a separate residual category. The writ petitions therefore failed on both contentions, and the claimed exemption was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43422</link>
      <description>An exemption notification using the phrase &quot;duty of customs&quot; was construed in line with the earlier connected judgment, and the broader reading that it extended beyond basic customs duty was rejected. The notification was also interpreted on the description &quot;polyester fibre&quot;; on the material considered, polyester staple fibre was treated as falling within that description because staple length was understood as a normal commercial attribute of polyester fibre, while polyester fibre waste was said to fall under a separate residual category. The writ petitions therefore failed on both contentions, and the claimed exemption was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>