<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43419</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act, finding it lacked jurisdiction as the petitioner&#039;s business activities were legal and crucial for foreign exchange earnings. Emphasizing the Act&#039;s aim to prevent smuggling, the Court deemed the detention illegal due to potential foreign exchange loss. Considering the petitioner&#039;s age and contributions, the Court concluded the detention could not stand, allowing the application, issuing appropriate writs, and permitting adjudication proceedings with a fair hearing opportunity. No costs were awarded, and parties were directed to comply with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43419</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act, finding it lacked jurisdiction as the petitioner&#039;s business activities were legal and crucial for foreign exchange earnings. Emphasizing the Act&#039;s aim to prevent smuggling, the Court deemed the detention illegal due to potential foreign exchange loss. Considering the petitioner&#039;s age and contributions, the Court concluded the detention could not stand, allowing the application, issuing appropriate writs, and permitting adjudication proceedings with a fair hearing opportunity. No costs were awarded, and parties were directed to comply with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>