<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 267 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769995</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging resolution plan approval. Appellant failed to file claim during CIRP despite being aware of proceedings through their own Delhi HC commercial suit. Section 9 application was previously rejected as debt couldn&#039;t constitute operational debt. After CoC approved resolution plan, appellant belatedly sought claim admission as financial debt. Tribunal held appellant&#039;s claim rightly classified as &#039;other creditor&#039; due to absence of timely filing. Claims submitted post-resolution plan approval cannot be admitted in CIRP. Resolution Professional committed no breach of regulations. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order allowing resolution plan contained no error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 08:37:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 267 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769995</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging resolution plan approval. Appellant failed to file claim during CIRP despite being aware of proceedings through their own Delhi HC commercial suit. Section 9 application was previously rejected as debt couldn&#039;t constitute operational debt. After CoC approved resolution plan, appellant belatedly sought claim admission as financial debt. Tribunal held appellant&#039;s claim rightly classified as &#039;other creditor&#039; due to absence of timely filing. Claims submitted post-resolution plan approval cannot be admitted in CIRP. Resolution Professional committed no breach of regulations. Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order allowing resolution plan contained no error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>