<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 268 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769996</link>
    <description>&quot;Any person aggrieved&quot; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is stated to cover operational creditors, erstwhile promoters and other affected stakeholders, so appeals are not barred for want of original applicant status. The note also states that insolvency fora cannot assume public-law jurisdiction over attachment issues under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and directions touching such attachment fall outside the appellate tribunal&#039;s remit. It further emphasises strict compliance with the Code and CIRP Regulations: the resolution process must meet the time-limit, eligibility under Section 29A, and mandatory requirements under Sections 30 and 31 and Regulation 38, failing which a resolution plan is invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 268 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769996</link>
      <description>&quot;Any person aggrieved&quot; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is stated to cover operational creditors, erstwhile promoters and other affected stakeholders, so appeals are not barred for want of original applicant status. The note also states that insolvency fora cannot assume public-law jurisdiction over attachment issues under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and directions touching such attachment fall outside the appellate tribunal&#039;s remit. It further emphasises strict compliance with the Code and CIRP Regulations: the resolution process must meet the time-limit, eligibility under Section 29A, and mandatory requirements under Sections 30 and 31 and Regulation 38, failing which a resolution plan is invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>