<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43417</link>
    <description>An order modifying a classification list could not be sustained because it was passed without a show cause notice or hearing, in breach of natural justice and the procedural requirements under the Central Excise Rules. The court held that the availability of an appellate remedy did not justify relegating the assessee to appeal where the primary order itself suffered from a clear procedural violation. The modification order was therefore quashed, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after issuing notice and granting a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43417</link>
      <description>An order modifying a classification list could not be sustained because it was passed without a show cause notice or hearing, in breach of natural justice and the procedural requirements under the Central Excise Rules. The court held that the availability of an appellate remedy did not justify relegating the assessee to appeal where the primary order itself suffered from a clear procedural violation. The modification order was therefore quashed, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after issuing notice and granting a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>