https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770025 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST proceedings related to bogus invoices for packaging materials during 2017-18. Petitioners failed to reply to the show cause notice for six months despite having requisite information, only responding when personal hearing was scheduled near the limitation period expiry. The court found petitioners were not diligent and noted fraudulent insolvency proceedings were initiated against recovery target companies. The HC declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226, directing petitioners to pursue appellate remedies. Appeal filed within 30 days with requisite pre-deposit would be entertained on merits without limitation bar. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770025 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST proceedings related to bogus invoices for packaging materials during 2017-18. Petitioners failed to reply to the show cause notice for six months despite having requisite information, only responding when personal hearing was scheduled near the limitation period expiry. The court found petitioners were not diligent and noted fraudulent insolvency proceedings were initiated against recovery target companies. The HC declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226, directing petitioners to pursue appellate remedies. Appeal filed within 30 days with requisite pre-deposit would be entertained on merits without limitation bar. Case-Laws GST Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770025