<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 299 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770027</link>
    <description>GST proceedings initiated against a proprietorship firm after the sole proprietor&#039;s death could not be sustained because the assessment was made against a dead person. The legal heir, not having been noticed by the revenue, was entitled to be heard before any tax liability was fastened on him. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh proceedings after notice to the petitioner in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 299 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770027</link>
      <description>GST proceedings initiated against a proprietorship firm after the sole proprietor&#039;s death could not be sustained because the assessment was made against a dead person. The legal heir, not having been noticed by the revenue, was entitled to be heard before any tax liability was fastened on him. The assessment order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh proceedings after notice to the petitioner in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>