<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 307 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770035</link>
    <description>HC invalidated a GST assessment order due to two critical procedural defects: absence of assessing officer&#039;s signature and missing Document Identification Number (DIN). The court set aside the assessment order and subsequent property attachment, granting tax authorities liberty to conduct a fresh assessment with proper compliance. The ruling emphasizes mandatory procedural requirements in tax orders, holding that signature and DIN are essential for order validity, and cannot be rectified through statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 08:37:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 307 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770035</link>
      <description>HC invalidated a GST assessment order due to two critical procedural defects: absence of assessing officer&#039;s signature and missing Document Identification Number (DIN). The court set aside the assessment order and subsequent property attachment, granting tax authorities liberty to conduct a fresh assessment with proper compliance. The ruling emphasizes mandatory procedural requirements in tax orders, holding that signature and DIN are essential for order validity, and cannot be rectified through statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>