https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43414 Delay in seeking restoration of a writ petition was not condoned where the application was filed after a long lapse and the explanation that the matter was not noted on board by the attorney's clerk was rejected. The Court treated repeated prior listings and the petitioners' failure to make any timely inquiry after dismissal as fatal to the request for indulgence. It also held that litigants who engage experienced attorneys cannot seek restoration as a matter of course by attributing default to their representatives. The dismissal order therefore remained in force and the petition was not restored. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:56:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43414 Delay in seeking restoration of a writ petition was not condoned where the application was filed after a long lapse and the explanation that the matter was not noted on board by the attorney's clerk was rejected. The Court treated repeated prior listings and the petitioners' failure to make any timely inquiry after dismissal as fatal to the request for indulgence. It also held that litigants who engage experienced attorneys cannot seek restoration as a matter of course by attributing default to their representatives. The dismissal order therefore remained in force and the petition was not restored. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43414