<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 310 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770038</link>
    <description>The SC held that a writ petition should not be rejected solely because an appellate remedy before the Tribunal was available, where the matter required consideration on its own merits. The High Court had declined to entertain the writ petition on that ground, but the SC found it appropriate to remit the matter for fresh examination in accordance with law. The writ petition was restored and the High Court was directed to hear it on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 310 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770038</link>
      <description>The SC held that a writ petition should not be rejected solely because an appellate remedy before the Tribunal was available, where the matter required consideration on its own merits. The High Court had declined to entertain the writ petition on that ground, but the SC found it appropriate to remit the matter for fresh examination in accordance with law. The writ petition was restored and the High Court was directed to hear it on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>