<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43413</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition concerning controversies under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioners&#039; claims regarding secondary packing and discount deductions lacked supporting evidence and legal basis. The Court emphasized the necessity of clear documentation and substantiating evidence in legal claims, ultimately leading to the rejection of the contentions raised by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43413</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition concerning controversies under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioners&#039; claims regarding secondary packing and discount deductions lacked supporting evidence and legal basis. The Court emphasized the necessity of clear documentation and substantiating evidence in legal claims, ultimately leading to the rejection of the contentions raised by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>