<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1556 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461871</link>
    <description>A writ challenge was treated as covered by an earlier decision involving the same controversy, so no separate adjudication was undertaken on the merits. The court disposed of the petition in terms of that earlier order, with the effect that the show cause notice and the proceedings initiated on its basis were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 21:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1556 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461871</link>
      <description>A writ challenge was treated as covered by an earlier decision involving the same controversy, so no separate adjudication was undertaken on the merits. The court disposed of the petition in terms of that earlier order, with the effect that the show cause notice and the proceedings initiated on its basis were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>