<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43408</link>
    <description>Rule 56A proforma credit was unavailable because the synthetic rubber input and the finished tyres did not satisfy the notified list and same-tariff-item requirements under the rule&#039;s substantive conditions. By contrast, the exemption notification was construed broadly: &quot;used in the manufacture of&quot; covered an integrated and indispensable intermediate process, so synthetic rubber used in the dip solution for tyre cord warp sheets qualified in principle as use in manufacture of tyres. The exemption claim therefore survived on construction, but had to be worked out before the competent authorities in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:38:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43408</link>
      <description>Rule 56A proforma credit was unavailable because the synthetic rubber input and the finished tyres did not satisfy the notified list and same-tariff-item requirements under the rule&#039;s substantive conditions. By contrast, the exemption notification was construed broadly: &quot;used in the manufacture of&quot; covered an integrated and indispensable intermediate process, so synthetic rubber used in the dip solution for tyre cord warp sheets qualified in principle as use in manufacture of tyres. The exemption claim therefore survived on construction, but had to be worked out before the competent authorities in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>