https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43403 Goods treated as warehoused at Bombay and then moved to another warehouse were covered by the statutory scheme for removal of warehoused goods from one warehouse to another, even though physical warehousing at Bombay had been waived for convenience. Public notices requiring bank guarantee and transit security were valid because the Customs Act and the Warehoused Goods (Removal) Regulations, 1963 permitted security in addition to bond, and the notices functioned as guidelines to regulate discretion, prevent evasion, and promote uniformity. The graded security requirements were held reasonable and non-arbitrary, so the challenge to the notices failed. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:15:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43403 Goods treated as warehoused at Bombay and then moved to another warehouse were covered by the statutory scheme for removal of warehoused goods from one warehouse to another, even though physical warehousing at Bombay had been waived for convenience. Public notices requiring bank guarantee and transit security were valid because the Customs Act and the Warehoused Goods (Removal) Regulations, 1963 permitted security in addition to bond, and the notices functioned as guidelines to regulate discretion, prevent evasion, and promote uniformity. The graded security requirements were held reasonable and non-arbitrary, so the challenge to the notices failed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43403