<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 49 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43396</link>
    <description>Chapter 98 of the Customs Tariff Act operates with overriding effect only for imports made in accordance with the Project Import Regulations, 1986, and Note 2 requires Heading 98.01 to be read with the meaning assigned in those regulations. On that scheme, the regulation-making power under the Customs Act supported the definition of &quot;industrial plant&quot; in Regulation 3(a), and the exclusion of photographic studios, film processing laboratories and similar service establishments was within that framework. The later tariff entry and 1986 Regulations therefore governed the classification, and the earlier position under the old heading and 1965 Regulations did not control. Imported photographic machinery for studios or film laboratories was outside Heading 98.01 and did not qualify for concessional project-import treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:50:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 49 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43396</link>
      <description>Chapter 98 of the Customs Tariff Act operates with overriding effect only for imports made in accordance with the Project Import Regulations, 1986, and Note 2 requires Heading 98.01 to be read with the meaning assigned in those regulations. On that scheme, the regulation-making power under the Customs Act supported the definition of &quot;industrial plant&quot; in Regulation 3(a), and the exclusion of photographic studios, film processing laboratories and similar service establishments was within that framework. The later tariff entry and 1986 Regulations therefore governed the classification, and the earlier position under the old heading and 1965 Regulations did not control. Imported photographic machinery for studios or film laboratories was outside Heading 98.01 and did not qualify for concessional project-import treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>