<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 154 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769882</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that service provider cannot be classified as Goods Transport Agency (GTA) without issuing consignment notes. The appellant&#039;s contract involved transfer of right to use vehicle rather than transportation service. Since essential GTA conditions were not met - providing transport service and issuing consignment notes - the service tax demand under reverse charge mechanism was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 08:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 154 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769882</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that service provider cannot be classified as Goods Transport Agency (GTA) without issuing consignment notes. The appellant&#039;s contract involved transfer of right to use vehicle rather than transportation service. Since essential GTA conditions were not met - providing transport service and issuing consignment notes - the service tax demand under reverse charge mechanism was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>