<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 168 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769896</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed appellant&#039;s application seeking admission of belated claim in IL&amp;amp;FS insolvency process. Appellant failed to file claim within extended deadline of 18.08.2022, eventually filing on 05.06.2023 through debenture trustee. Tribunal found appellant lacked due diligence and provided no justifiable reason for delay. Court held allowing belated claims would open floodgates for similar applications, prejudice timely creditors, and jeopardize ongoing resolution process where interim distribution had already commenced. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet prescribed timelines without genuine grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 08:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 168 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769896</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed appellant&#039;s application seeking admission of belated claim in IL&amp;amp;FS insolvency process. Appellant failed to file claim within extended deadline of 18.08.2022, eventually filing on 05.06.2023 through debenture trustee. Tribunal found appellant lacked due diligence and provided no justifiable reason for delay. Court held allowing belated claims would open floodgates for similar applications, prejudice timely creditors, and jeopardize ongoing resolution process where interim distribution had already commenced. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet prescribed timelines without genuine grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>