<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 180 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769908</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the civil appeal due to 229-day delay in filing, finding the appellant&#039;s explanation unsatisfactory. While preserving the legal question for potential future consideration, the court disposed of all pending applications, effectively ending the current proceedings without addressing the substantive legal merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 08:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 180 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769908</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the civil appeal due to 229-day delay in filing, finding the appellant&#039;s explanation unsatisfactory. While preserving the legal question for potential future consideration, the court disposed of all pending applications, effectively ending the current proceedings without addressing the substantive legal merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>