<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769916</link>
    <description>SC affirmed ITAT&#039;s territorial jurisdiction rules based on Assessing Officer&#039;s location. Delhi Benches lack jurisdiction for appeals originating from Kolkata tax authorities. Both assessee and Revenue appeals dismissed, with liberty to file fresh appeals before Kolkata Benches. Jurisdictional defect confirmed through established legal precedents, emphasizing that appeal transfer does not create jurisdictional competence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 17:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769916</link>
      <description>SC affirmed ITAT&#039;s territorial jurisdiction rules based on Assessing Officer&#039;s location. Delhi Benches lack jurisdiction for appeals originating from Kolkata tax authorities. Both assessee and Revenue appeals dismissed, with liberty to file fresh appeals before Kolkata Benches. Jurisdictional defect confirmed through established legal precedents, emphasizing that appeal transfer does not create jurisdictional competence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>