<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 189 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769917</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal regarding Section 50C addition, holding that where the assessee declared long-term capital gains based on actual sale price exceeding stamp duty value, Section 50C does not apply. The tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 4,26,562. On cost of acquisition for indexation benefit, considering conflicting valuation reports of Rs. 20.15 lakhs versus Rs. 12,45,498, the tribunal adopted a middle approach, fixing cost of acquisition at Rs. 18 lakhs in the interest of justice, clarifying this would not set precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 11:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 189 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769917</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal regarding Section 50C addition, holding that where the assessee declared long-term capital gains based on actual sale price exceeding stamp duty value, Section 50C does not apply. The tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 4,26,562. On cost of acquisition for indexation benefit, considering conflicting valuation reports of Rs. 20.15 lakhs versus Rs. 12,45,498, the tribunal adopted a middle approach, fixing cost of acquisition at Rs. 18 lakhs in the interest of justice, clarifying this would not set precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>