<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 190 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769918</link>
    <description>The AT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years, finding them invalid. The court determined that the AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment based solely on audit objections without fresh material evidence. The reassessment was deemed a mere change of opinion, contravening legal principles established by SC precedents. The appeal was allowed, invalidating the tax department&#039;s attempt to reopen the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 11:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 190 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769918</link>
      <description>The AT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years, finding them invalid. The court determined that the AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment based solely on audit objections without fresh material evidence. The reassessment was deemed a mere change of opinion, contravening legal principles established by SC precedents. The appeal was allowed, invalidating the tax department&#039;s attempt to reopen the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>