<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 212 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769940</link>
    <description>Tribunal dismissed taxpayer&#039;s appeal regarding two key tax-related additions: (a) Rs. 83,86,539/- for technical services fees due to lack of substantive evidence, and (b) Rs. 66,61,467/- under section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding statutory limit. The HC found no violation of natural justice and rejected general grounds of appeal. The entire appeal was dismissed, upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s original additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 08:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 212 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769940</link>
      <description>Tribunal dismissed taxpayer&#039;s appeal regarding two key tax-related additions: (a) Rs. 83,86,539/- for technical services fees due to lack of substantive evidence, and (b) Rs. 66,61,467/- under section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding statutory limit. The HC found no violation of natural justice and rejected general grounds of appeal. The entire appeal was dismissed, upholding the Assessing Officer&#039;s original additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>