<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 219 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769947</link>
    <description>SC dismissed SLP filed by Revenue due to 597-day unexplained delay, disposing of all pending applications. While rejecting the petition on procedural grounds, the Court explicitly preserved the underlying legal question for potential future consideration, maintaining the substantive legal issue&#039;s potential relevance despite the procedural dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 219 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769947</link>
      <description>SC dismissed SLP filed by Revenue due to 597-day unexplained delay, disposing of all pending applications. While rejecting the petition on procedural grounds, the Court explicitly preserved the underlying legal question for potential future consideration, maintaining the substantive legal issue&#039;s potential relevance despite the procedural dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>