https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769954 An ex parte demand order was quashed because the assessee was not given an effective opportunity of personal hearing. The notice was defective as the hearing date preceded the deadline for filing the reply, and although a reply was said to have been submitted, no further hearing was granted before the order was passed. On these facts, the court found the order to have been made without real hearing and without proper application of mind. The matter was remitted for a fresh reply, fresh notice of hearing, and a fresh order in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 May 2025 08:34:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769954 An ex parte demand order was quashed because the assessee was not given an effective opportunity of personal hearing. The notice was defective as the hearing date preceded the deadline for filing the reply, and although a reply was said to have been submitted, no further hearing was granted before the order was passed. On these facts, the court found the order to have been made without real hearing and without proper application of mind. The matter was remitted for a fresh reply, fresh notice of hearing, and a fresh order in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769954