<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43381</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Original Petition challenging customs orders, emphasizing that the statutory remedy provided under the Customs Act was effective and precluded the High Court&#039;s intervention under Article 226. The Court highlighted that the Customs Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision was final, subject to specific provisions, and that the High Court&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction should not be an alternative to statutory remedies. The Court underscored that interference under Article 226 is warranted only in exceptional circumstances, which were not present in this case, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43381</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Original Petition challenging customs orders, emphasizing that the statutory remedy provided under the Customs Act was effective and precluded the High Court&#039;s intervention under Article 226. The Court highlighted that the Customs Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision was final, subject to specific provisions, and that the High Court&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction should not be an alternative to statutory remedies. The Court underscored that interference under Article 226 is warranted only in exceptional circumstances, which were not present in this case, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>