<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1566 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461848</link>
    <description>CESTAT set aside major service-tax demands arising from alleged non-payment on hostel fees for non-residential courses, revenue-sharing fees from a franchisee arrangement, and sales/ library charges, holding the agreements were principal-to-principal and many supplies were sales not taxable services; invocation of the extended limitation was also disallowed. The Tribunal upheld limited liabilities: short-payment due to accrual accounting, tax paid on miscellaneous receipts, and reversal of CENVAT credit with interest. Penalty for improper registration and penalties on amounts paid prior to notice were set aside. The appeal was disposed on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1566 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461848</link>
      <description>CESTAT set aside major service-tax demands arising from alleged non-payment on hostel fees for non-residential courses, revenue-sharing fees from a franchisee arrangement, and sales/ library charges, holding the agreements were principal-to-principal and many supplies were sales not taxable services; invocation of the extended limitation was also disallowed. The Tribunal upheld limited liabilities: short-payment due to accrual accounting, tax paid on miscellaneous receipts, and reversal of CENVAT credit with interest. Penalty for improper registration and penalties on amounts paid prior to notice were set aside. The appeal was disposed on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>