https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42729 Two procedural issues have produced widespread litigation delaying confirmation of Enforcement Directorate provisional attachments under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act: coram non judice challenges to single member confirmations in the absence of the judicial member of the three member Adjudicating Authority, and disputes over the statutory 180 day limit for confirmation during extraordinary circumstances such as the COVID 19 pandemic. These challenges have led to multiple stay orders that account for a substantial portion of the gap between assets provisionally attached and those confirmed by the Authority. en-us Fri, 02 May 2025 19:01:03 +0530 Fri, 02 May 2025 19:01:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42729 Two procedural issues have produced widespread litigation delaying confirmation of Enforcement Directorate provisional attachments under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act: coram non judice challenges to single member confirmations in the absence of the judicial member of the three member Adjudicating Authority, and disputes over the statutory 180 day limit for confirmation during extraordinary circumstances such as the COVID 19 pandemic. These challenges have led to multiple stay orders that account for a substantial portion of the gap between assets provisionally attached and those confirmed by the Authority. News - Fri, 02 May 2025 19:01:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42729