<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43375</link>
    <description>Cylinder rent was challenged as being wrongly included in assessable value under excise law, but the writ petition was dismissed because the assessing authority had not yet decided the issue and the petitioner had adequate statutory remedies. The court therefore declined writ intervention at that stage and left the dispute to the statutory assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43375</link>
      <description>Cylinder rent was challenged as being wrongly included in assessable value under excise law, but the writ petition was dismissed because the assessing authority had not yet decided the issue and the petitioner had adequate statutory remedies. The court therefore declined writ intervention at that stage and left the dispute to the statutory assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>