<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1723 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461841</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal resolved a tax dispute regarding municipal payment deductibility under Income Tax Act, Section 23. The Tribunal allowed the taxpayer&#039;s deduction of Rs. 25,98,622/- paid to Municipal Corporation, finding it a municipal tax. The court rejected the revenue department&#039;s disallowance, citing precedent and accepting duplicate payment evidence during appellate proceedings. The Rs. 18,19,035/- addition was deleted, favoring the taxpayer&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 14:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1723 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461841</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal resolved a tax dispute regarding municipal payment deductibility under Income Tax Act, Section 23. The Tribunal allowed the taxpayer&#039;s deduction of Rs. 25,98,622/- paid to Municipal Corporation, finding it a municipal tax. The court rejected the revenue department&#039;s disallowance, citing precedent and accepting duplicate payment evidence during appellate proceedings. The Rs. 18,19,035/- addition was deleted, favoring the taxpayer&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>