<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43363</link>
    <description>Central excise duty on A.D. wet cells was held unsustainable where the assessee manufactured only the carbon/zinc elements, procured the remaining components from the market, and supplied the cells in unassembled condition. The earlier Tribunal ruling on identical facts had already held that such activity did not amount to manufacture of complete cells for duty purposes, and that determination had attained finality. As the impugned demand proceeded on the rejected assumption that complete wet cells were manufactured, the factual basis for the levy failed and the orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 48 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43363</link>
      <description>Central excise duty on A.D. wet cells was held unsustainable where the assessee manufactured only the carbon/zinc elements, procured the remaining components from the market, and supplied the cells in unassembled condition. The earlier Tribunal ruling on identical facts had already held that such activity did not amount to manufacture of complete cells for duty purposes, and that determination had attained finality. As the impugned demand proceeded on the rejected assumption that complete wet cells were manufactured, the factual basis for the levy failed and the orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>