<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 45 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769773</link>
    <description>HC quashed re-employment of Director, Animal Husbandry after superannuation, finding it violated mandatory procedural requirements under Chapter 22 of Personnel Handbook. Court held the decision was arbitrary, based solely on ministerial recommendation without considering other eligible candidates or recording satisfaction of exceptional circumstances. The re-employment failed to serve public interest and constituted a &quot;spoil system.&quot; HC directed fresh DPC to consider all eligible candidates including petitioner who was illegally deprived of promotion consideration. Extension/re-employment requires data-based decision reflecting exceptional circumstances and public grounds, not mere political recommendations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 45 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769773</link>
      <description>HC quashed re-employment of Director, Animal Husbandry after superannuation, finding it violated mandatory procedural requirements under Chapter 22 of Personnel Handbook. Court held the decision was arbitrary, based solely on ministerial recommendation without considering other eligible candidates or recording satisfaction of exceptional circumstances. The re-employment failed to serve public interest and constituted a &quot;spoil system.&quot; HC directed fresh DPC to consider all eligible candidates including petitioner who was illegally deprived of promotion consideration. Extension/re-employment requires data-based decision reflecting exceptional circumstances and public grounds, not mere political recommendations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>