https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769775 The SC dismissed constitutional challenges to Sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which determine pecuniary jurisdictions of district, state and national commissions based on value of goods/services paid as consideration rather than compensation claimed. The court held these provisions are constitutional, not violative of Article 14, and not manifestly arbitrary. Parliament has legislative competence to prescribe jurisdictional limits. The court directed the Central Consumer Protection Council and Authority to effectively discharge their statutory duties for efficient consumer redressal. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769775 The SC dismissed constitutional challenges to Sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which determine pecuniary jurisdictions of district, state and national commissions based on value of goods/services paid as consideration rather than compensation claimed. The court held these provisions are constitutional, not violative of Article 14, and not manifestly arbitrary. Parliament has legislative competence to prescribe jurisdictional limits. The court directed the Central Consumer Protection Council and Authority to effectively discharge their statutory duties for efficient consumer redressal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769775