<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769776</link>
    <description>The SC directed authorities to make digital KYC processes accessible for persons with disabilities, particularly acid attack survivors and visually impaired individuals. The court recognized digital access as a constitutional right under Article 21, mandating that financial institutions adopt alternative verification methods beyond traditional &quot;blinking of eyes&quot; requirements. Key directions included implementing accessibility standards, conducting periodic audits, accepting thumb impressions, continuing paper-based KYC options, establishing grievance mechanisms, and creating dedicated helplines. RBI was ordered to issue guidelines for alternative liveness verification methods and enhance OTP-based authentication. The court emphasized that bridging the digital divide is a constitutional imperative, requiring inclusive digital ecosystems for all marginalized populations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769776</link>
      <description>The SC directed authorities to make digital KYC processes accessible for persons with disabilities, particularly acid attack survivors and visually impaired individuals. The court recognized digital access as a constitutional right under Article 21, mandating that financial institutions adopt alternative verification methods beyond traditional &quot;blinking of eyes&quot; requirements. Key directions included implementing accessibility standards, conducting periodic audits, accepting thumb impressions, continuing paper-based KYC options, establishing grievance mechanisms, and creating dedicated helplines. RBI was ordered to issue guidelines for alternative liveness verification methods and enhance OTP-based authentication. The court emphasized that bridging the digital divide is a constitutional imperative, requiring inclusive digital ecosystems for all marginalized populations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>