<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 52 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769780</link>
    <description>The SC and Tribunal ruled that education cess and secondary &amp;amp; higher education cess are integral parts of excise duty, entitling the appellant to refund under area-based exemption. The show cause notices seeking recovery were deemed unsustainable. The court emphasized the principle of finality in litigation, holding that prior judicial precedents cannot be reopened, thereby confirming the appellant&#039;s refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 52 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769780</link>
      <description>The SC and Tribunal ruled that education cess and secondary &amp;amp; higher education cess are integral parts of excise duty, entitling the appellant to refund under area-based exemption. The show cause notices seeking recovery were deemed unsustainable. The court emphasized the principle of finality in litigation, holding that prior judicial precedents cannot be reopened, thereby confirming the appellant&#039;s refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>